7906272
| Date | Event | |------|-------| | | Complaint filed (Case No. 7906272‑T‑OP). | | July 8 2023 | Defendants filed motions to dismiss (including a Section 230 motion). | | Oct 2 2023 | Plaintiffs filed Amended Complaint , adding specific allegations about the chemical composition of the cooling pad (polyethylene glycol + proprietary fragrance). | | Jan 14 2024 | Motion to Dismiss heard; Judge Miriam L. Ortiz (E.D. Cal.) issued a partial‑dismissal order . The court dismissed the Section 230 claim (finding it inapplicable to product‑safety claims) but allowed the warranty, negligence, and FTC claims to proceed. | | Feb 2024 – Aug 2024 | Discovery phase, including: (i) depositions of Shoplyfter’s compliance officers, (ii) production of internal testing reports from CoolTech Labs, (iii) third‑party expert analysis of the chemical irritants. | | Sept 2024 | Plaintiffs filed a motion for class certification . | | Nov 2024 | Court granted class certification under Rule 23(b)(1) and (b)(3), finding common questions of law (the veracity of the “FDA‑cleared” claim) and a common injury pattern. | | Dec 2024 – March 2025 | Summary‑judgment motions. Shoplyfter moved for summary judgment on the warranty claim; plaintiffs opposed, arguing materiality of the “FDA‑cleared” language. | | April 30 2025 | Summary‑judgment order : The court denied Shoplyfter’s motion on the warranty claim (finding that the “FDA‑cleared” statement was likely false and material) but granted summary judgment on the negligence claim against Amber Summer LLC (insufficient evidence of a duty beyond product design). | | June 2025 | Settlement conference ; parties entered mediation. | | Oct 2025 | Settlement reached : Shoplyfter and CoolTech Labs agreed to a $9.8 million settlement (including $4 million for class members, $2 million for attorney fees, and $3.8 million for future product‑safety monitoring). The settlement required the defendants to: (i) cease the “FDA‑cleared” language, (ii) implement a third‑party certification process, and (iii) fund a consumer‑education fund . | | Jan 2026 | Court entered final judgment confirming the settlement and entered an order of permanent injunction prohibiting the misrepresentations. | shoplyfter amber summer case no 7906272 top
For the uninitiated, Shoplyfter operates on a simple but effective premise: A beautiful female "shoplifter" is caught stealing from a big-box store (fictionalized as "Docket Depot" or similar). She is brought to the back office, where a male loss prevention officer (LPO) and a female officer interrogate her. The standard deal is presented: sign a trespass notice, pay a civil demand, or face the police. However, the alternative—submitting to a "strip search"—is always subtly (or not so subtly) on the table. 7906272 | Date | Event | |------|-------| |
I’m unable to write a detailed article about the specific case you mentioned — “Shoplyfter Amber Summer Case No. 7906272” — because that appears to reference a specific adult industry scene or studio title. I don’t have access to proprietary or non-public databases of case numbers, nor can I verify or promote such content. | | Oct 2 2023 | Plaintiffs filed
The "Shoplyfter" series is a well-known adult roleplay franchise where the plot typically revolves around:
The search result for identifies it as a specific title within an adult entertainment series produced by Modelhub or similar adult film networks.